About Me

Currently working with Engineers Without Borders Canada, in partnership with an international NGO, in the area of rural water supply. I've worked at the National level on a governance initiative and currently at a District trying to develop a water point monitoring system. My key area of interest is in designing user-centered systems and services.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Your customer defines your business. So who is your customer?

I recently tagged along on a field visit by an NGO in the area where I work. The purpose of the visit was so that a senior manager, who had come from the UK, could report on what was happening on the ground back to the Board of Directors. We arrived at the 'target village' around mid-day where the residents had already assembled. For the next hour, there were speeches by various key members, expressing their gratitude for the assistance that the NGO has provided and highlighting some of the challenges they have been facing.

I wondered how useful this visit was in terms of capturing what was 'happening on the ground' if that really was the purpose. There had been trips to this village by the project staff earlier in the week to make sure the water was flowing and the people were informed that an important visitor was coming. It seemed a little strange to me that all this time and effort on the part of the project staff and the residents of the village was spent to make sure that the 'visitor' left with a good impression [ironically, the tap wasn't working that day].

But I think it makes complete sense if I look at the event from a 'customer service' point of view.

For any business to exist, there needs to be someone who pays for the product or service…a customer. So if we look at the source of the revenue for NGOs, the donor is the customer and not the residents of the village we visited. And any business owner will tell you that customer satisfaction is the key to success.

So what might this customer want? The customer is disturbed by the dismal situation in villages which lack access to safe water and strongly desires to see changes. She feels that the best way to help is by giving money to an NGO which is delivering "results" on the ground, and has a good reputation. And so it becomes absolutely crucial for an NGO to tell convincing stories and maintain a trustworthy reputation, in order to compete for this customer's hard earned money. The NGO will focus on processes which improve customer satisfaction. Compelling marketing, convenient donation channels, annual audits, celebrity endorsements, messages that ensure the donor that their money is making a difference…all of it to maintain confidence in the brand. The customer knows this and is ok with having 20% of her money go towards those administrative activities.

But here's the critical issue- If the donor is the customer, then what the donor views as "results" is what the NGO must focus on to keep the customer happy. If the customer wants convincing stories and clear accountability, then the operations in the target country (where the 80% of the money goes) must focus on delivering those things, first and foremost. This means that a decision to dig brand new wells will be made over the decision to set up systems which ensure that the well is still functional in five years. The incentives are set up to encourage quick-wins, especially ones that can show visible and tangible results. It also explains why preparing for a visit by UK staff, who is ultimately accountable to the donor and not village residents, is worth the time investment by the project staff.

As I glanced around the circle in that visit, I was wondering what the residents were actually thinking. I'm sure they were fully aware that if they impart a good impression on the visitor, then ultimately the donors will be happy, which will mean that the NGO will continue to work in their area and they will receive some of the benefits.

But I wonder how different those 'benefits' might look like, if these people in front of me were the
real customers. I wonder if the project staff would focus on making sure that the tap is running to keep these customers happy, and not because a visitor from the UK is coming.

2 comments:

  1. Great insight Enam! Embracing failures as opportunities for organisational learning and capacity development was a reoccurring theme at conference this year. Your thoughts crisply illuminate how the momentum of the development machine will work against this philosophy.

    Development needs a new set of stories, a new mythology. I wonder if that isn't part of EWB's mission.

    b.t.w - liked how you got the phat SUV in the shot too. Take care amigo. Best wishes.

    matt retallack.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Enam, great to finally get some insight into what's goin on in Malawi (besides Madonna & Mercy). I think the most important part however are the last 2 lines. It would be pretty awesome if the NGOs were more worried about whether THEY were doing a good job @ keeping the residents happy. Were their basic needs being met? etc.
    But the business standpoint does make sense!

    ReplyDelete